
China Slaps Japan with Export Ban After Taiwan Remarks, Sparking Trade War Fears
China’s sudden export ban on critical minerals jolts Japan’s high-tech and defense sectors, raising fears of a protracted trade war.
Tokyo, Dawn
The first hint of trouble arrived not in a diplomatic cable but on a freight dock in Yokohama. Shortly after sunrise, customs officers waved aside a container of specialty graphite electrodes bound for a Toyota parts plant and quietly slapped it with a new red stamp: EXPORT SUSPENDED – ORIGIN: CHINA. By noon, the same seal had appeared on shipments of gallium, germanium and two dozen rare-earth oxides. Japan’s high-tech assembly lines, long tuned to just-in-time precision, shuddered.
The Spark
Three days earlier, Japan’s foreign minister had called Taiwan “a critical security partner” during a Washington press conference. Beijing responded within hours, warning of “forceful counter-measures.” Few expected those measures to land in the form of export controls so sweeping they rival the sanctions once reserved for geopolitical adversaries.
“This isn’t a warning shot; it’s a broadside,” said a senior Japanese trade official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “If it lasts more than a month, entire supply chains will re-route at huge cost.”
Counting the Costs
Japan imports roughly 40 % of its gallium and 60 % of its germanium from China—minerals essential for radar systems, EV batteries and fifth-generation fighter jets. Overnight spot prices on the Osaka exchange leapt 18 %, while shares of Toyota, Sony and Mitsubishi Heavy all slid more than 3 % in after-hours trade.
- Automotive: Toyota alone consumes 12 % of China’s refined gallium for its hybrid power electronics.
- Defense: Japan’s next-gen F-X fighter relies on Chinese-sourced high-purity germanium substrates for infrared sensors.
- Chipmaking: Shin-Etsu Chemical, the world’s largest silicon wafer maker, has < 3 weeks of critical stockpiles.
Beijing’s Calculus
Chinese state media framed the ban as “safeguarding national sovereignty,” but analysts see a tactical move to split the U.S.-Japan alliance ahead of a planned trilateral summit in August. By targeting materials Japan cannot quickly replace, Beijing wields leverage without firing a shot—or risking American secondary sanctions.
Tokyo’s Scramble
Prime Minister’s Office officials convened an emergency “tiger team” late Tuesday, dispatching envoys to Australia, Kazakhstan and South Africa in search of alternative supply. Yet new mines take years, not weeks. Meanwhile, Japan’s METI is dusting off a Cold-War-era national stockpile law that could compel manufacturers to surrender private inventories to defense contractors.
“We’ve slept on this risk for twenty years,” lamented Professor Yui Nakamura of Tokyo University. “Now the bill is due.”
Global Ripples
U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai called the ban “deeply concerning,” while EU chiefs warned of “further weaponization of trade.” But for Japanese factory managers like Kenji Ota, the worry is more immediate: “If we can’t get gallium by September, we shut down lines. That’s 3,000 workers idle.”
What Happens Next
Both capitals have left off-ramps. Beijing’s commerce ministry hinted the bans could be “reviewed” if Japan reaffirms the One-China policy. Tokyo, however, must balance alliance politics with industrial survival. In the meantime, sourcing agents from Sapporo to Fukuoka are scouring the planet for every last kilo—while clocks inside clean-room fabs tick louder each day.